District Court Cases in Florida
Cases 91 - 100 of 794,846
Naboo Royal Cruiser LLC v. Gulfgen LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21711
Plaintiff:
Naboo Royal Cruiser LLC
Defendant:
Gulfgen LLC, Peter Nomikos and C. A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Motion for Leave to File Notice of Appeal
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Dean et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Stephen Dean, Fraser Clan Consultants LLC, David Patrick Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Nelson v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Charles Nelson
Defendant:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Windsor v. Pepperman et al
as 5:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
William Michael Windsor
Defendant:
Judge Carla R. Pepperman, Emily Curington and Gary Cooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Urizar et al
as 6:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Jejuan Sims
Defendant:
Gaby Aparicio Urizar and EXP Realty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donato Castro Personal Representative v. Torres et al
as 8:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Juan Donato Castro Personal Representative
Defendant:
Maria Torres and Grady Judd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
