US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 74
Donaldson et al v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 4:2009cv00117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Donaldson and Wanda Donaldson
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC, GMAC Mortgage LLC, GMAC, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Langdale et al v. Langdale et al
as 7:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
Robert Harley Langdale, Robert Harley Langdale, Robert Harley Langdale and others
Defendant:
John W. Langdale, Jr., James W. Phillips and Steve D. Watts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Starling v. United States Department of Justice
as 5:2007cv00466
Plaintiff:
Edward Starling
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jenkins v. Ameliorate, LLC et al
as 4:2007cv00143
Plaintiff:
Edmond Jenkins, Edmond Jenkins and Edmond Jenkins
Defendant:
Ameliorate, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Greene v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 3:2007cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tom E. Greene
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A., Chase Bank USA, N.A., Mann Bracken, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Jordan et al v. The Scott Fetzer Company
as 4:2007cv00080
Plaintiff:
James Jordan, James Jordan, James Jordan and others
Defendant:
The Scott Fetzer Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Whitaker et al v. MGA, Inc. et al
as 1:2005cv00099
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ASI Computer Technologies, Inc. v. XTreme P.C. Computer Wholesale, Inc. et al
as 6:2005cv00025
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rumble v. Waterhouse et al
as 5:2005cv00133
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
UAP Distribution v. Ross et al
as 1:2004cv00179
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
