US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Sullivan Pinestraw, Inc. v. KNL Logistics, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01197
Plaintiff:
Sullivan Pinestraw, Inc.
Defendant:
KNL Logistics, Inc., Matt Lillquist and Charles G. Kulp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gipson/Hudson Properties, LLC v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00007
Plaintiff:
Gipson/Hudson Properties, LLC and Gipson/Hudson Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Habersham County, Georgia and others
Counter Claimant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Counter Defendant:
Gipson/Hudson Properties, LLC and Gipson/Hudson Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
AT&T Corp. v. Fulton County Government
as 1:2008cv00003
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corp.
Defendant:
Fulton County Government
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act
Department of Transportation v. 0.133 acres of land et al
as 1:2007cv03030
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Defendant:
0.133 acres of land, Norfolk and Southern Railway Company, Evelyn Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10762 Interstate Commerce Act/General Tariff Requirements
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Stevens Graphics, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02720
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Stevens Graphics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10762 Interstate Commerce Act/General Tariff Requirements
AT&T Corp. v. Planned Parenthood of Georgia, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00588
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corp.
Defendant:
Planned Parenthood of Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act - Collection for Services
Competitive Carriers of the South, Inc. et al v. The Georgia Public Service Commission et al
as 1:2006cv00972
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
