US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,618
Davis v. Richmond Honan Development and Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Randy Davis
Defendant:
Richmond Honan Development and Acquisitions, LLC and Scott Honan
Henry v. Clayton County School District
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Karen Henry, Isaac R Britt and Jason Seda
Defendant:
Clayton County School District
Brown v. Routes Car Rental USA Inc.
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Bayo K. Brown
Defendant:
Routes Car Rental USA Inc.
Kight v. Universal Pure
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Camaron Kight
Defendant:
Universal Pure
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dickerson v. Southeastern Psychological Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Kelly Dickerson
Defendant:
Southeastern Psychological Associates, Inc. and Priscilla B. Faulkner
Nikolich et al v. Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Michael Nikolich and Aaron Sponaugle
Defendant:
Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc. doing business as Southern Protection Agency
Warren et al v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Karon Warren, Deborah Kaplan, Kimberly Kavin and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor, Julie Su, Administrator Jessica Looman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Glessing v. Tattle Tail, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Mia Glessing and Meaghan Wells
Defendant:
Tattle Tail, Inc. doing business as Tattletale Lounge, Denis Kaufman and Richard R. Schronce
Clark-Fortunat v. Republic National Distributing Company, LLC
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Chantel Clark-Fortunat
Defendant:
Republic National Distributing Company, LLC
Headen et al v. Decostar Industries, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Yunona Headen and Trinady Boddie
Defendant:
Decostar Industries, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
