US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,462
Conroy v. Pinckneyville Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Bill Conroy
Defendant:
Service List, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Sennings et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Dorenzo T Moore
Defendant:
Chad Sennings, Loy Williams, Dr Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Duran Johnson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Anthony Wills and Rob Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Willis et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Connail Jones
Defendant:
Anthony Willis and Wexford Health Care Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Lorie Cunningham, Wexford Health Source, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Jacoby et al
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Reco Reed
Defendant:
Nancy Jacoby and Amy Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre, Dr. Larson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noward v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Justin Noward
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Kimberly Huarre, Sgt Dilg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Thornton
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
