Illinois Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 539
Kenney v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2015cv01380
Plaintiff:
William J Kenney
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abernathy v Eastern Illinois Railroad Company
as 3:2015cv03223
Plaintiff:
Marvin Abernathy
Defendant:
Eastern Illinois Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Von De Bur v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2015cv50176
Plaintiff:
David E. Von De Bur
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 3:2015cv00736
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Smith
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Blanchard v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2015cv00689
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Blanchard
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Schmitt v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2015cv05270
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schmitt
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cooley v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 3:2015cv00464
Plaintiff:
James E Cooley
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Willett v. Chicago Terminal Railroad Company
as 1:2015cv02038
Plaintiff:
Michael Willett
Defendant:
Chicago Terminal Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Pierce v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 3:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
Paul E Pierce
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Blake
as 1:2015cv01106
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Blake
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , Professional Transportation, Inc. , Reginald A Hooks and others
Counter_claimant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , Professional Transportation, Inc. and Reginald A Hooks
Counter_defendant:
Brittany J Ackerman
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
