US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 140
United States of America v. $44,925.00 in US Currency
as 2:2010cv00502
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$44,925.00 in US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 1920 Bayer Street Fort Wayne IN et al
as 1:2010cv00408
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1920 Bayer Street Fort Wayne IN, 2015 Jessie Avenue Fort Wayne IN, 663 Putnam Street Fort Wayne IN and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Thomas
as 3:2010cv00433
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert B Thomas
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
United States of America v. Thomas
as 3:2010cv00420
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jacques Thomas
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853
United States of America v. Ward
as 3:2010cv00363
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isiah Ward
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853
United States of America v. Hill et al
as 3:2010cv00360
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Don Diego Hill and Landris McFadden
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853
United States of America v. $650.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2010cv00289
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$650.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 1994 Cadillac Seville, VIN: 1G6KS52Y5RU827732
as 2:2010cv00290
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1994 Cadillac Seville, VIN: 1G6KS52Y5RU827732
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2005 Cadillac CTS, VIN: 1G6DP567250236772
as 2:2010cv00267
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2005 Cadillac CTS VIN 1G6DP567250236772
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2006 Lexus GS430, VIN JTHBN96S165003541
as 2:2010cv00266
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2006 Lexus GS430 VIN JTHBN96S165003541
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
