US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 53
DARINGER v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv00335
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DARINGER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DORRIS v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv00311
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
KAREN DORRIS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PETRUCCI v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00776
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff:
KAREN PETRUCCI
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MCINTOSH v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00171
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff:
MYRTLE MCINTOSH
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
KNOLLMAN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN.
as 1:2013cv01443
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff:
CLARE KNOLLMAN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
THORNTON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2013cv00161
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
DEENA THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CARROLL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00582
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D. CARROLL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MIDDLETOWN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
MIDDLETOWN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
KASTNER v. ASTRUE
as 3:2009cv00186
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KASTNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
MCDERMOTT v. LEAVITT
as 1:2006cv01327
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
