US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,164
MCCRARY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
STACIE MCCRARY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WRAY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
SHARON M. WRAY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
OWENS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
DAWN R. OWENS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CALDWELL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
KAREN CALDWELL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SCHMITT v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
ERIC RAY SCHMITT, JR.
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BENNETT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02229
Plaintiff:
JAKOB M. BENNETT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
DEMERY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv02192
Plaintiff:
ALICIA S. DEMERY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
JORDAN v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
MATILDA JORDAN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
KIZZEE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02121
Plaintiff:
MICHELE L. KIZZEE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
HARVEY v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
DEVIN SAMUEL HARVEY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
