US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 153
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv03206
Plaintiff:
JEWELL SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
ROPER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv03146
Plaintiff:
GLORIA JEANI ROPER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
WHITE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv02936
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JESSICA WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
DINE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv02806
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHITWOOD, MD, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WINDROSE HEALTH NETWORK, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANNE DINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WEBSTER et al v. CENTER FOR DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02677
Defendant:
CDI INDIANA, LLC and CENTER FOR DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WEBSTER and COURTNEY WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
WORLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv02415
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
LANCE R. WORLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
SMITH v. MAHMOOD et al
as 2:2016cv00326
Defendant:
AHSAN MAHMOOD, JOHN MATHEWS, STEVEN D. MAYNARD and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. SHERWOOD
as 1:2016cv01930
Defendant:
GUY SHERWOOD
Plaintiff:
MARY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
KRAEMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv01522
Plaintiff:
RONALD KRAEMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
SHAFFER et al v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 2:2016cv00087
Defendant:
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, JOSHUA JONES, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and others
Plaintiff:
T. S. and MARGARET SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
