Indiana Contract Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 3,809
SHOE SENSATION, INC. v. C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
SHOE SENSATION, INC.
Defendant:
C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act
Williams et al v. Thor Motor Coach Inc
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Michael E Williams and Kimberly K Williams
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
STEAK N SHAKE INC. v. REXX MANAGEMENT LLC
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
STEAK N SHAKE INC.
Defendant:
REXX MANAGEMENT LLC and ROBERT J REXROAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Sands et al v. Forest River Inc
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Shannon Leigh Sands and William Basil Sands
Defendant:
Forest River Inc
Other:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bracken et al v. Forest River Inc.
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Cecil J Bracken and Jennifer A Bracken
Defendant:
Forest River Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Tate v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tate
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Walker v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Susana Walker
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Scott v. Grand Design RV, LLC
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Jerry Scott
Defendant:
Grand Design RV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Crosby et al v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Brien Crosby and Alicia Crosby
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Prestopic et al v. Newmar Corporation
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Marla Jo Prestopic and Steven C. Prestopic
Defendant:
Newmar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
