District of Indiana Labor Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 3,739
PERRY v. TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
as 3:2015cv00072
Plaintiff: TOM PERRY
Defendant: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
HINES v. CLEAN THE WORLD GLOBAL, LLC
as 1:2015cv00812
Defendant: CLEAN THE WORLD GLOBAL, LLC
Plaintiff: AMANDA M. HINES
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
SOLA v. JESSE, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00809
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
Griffin v. M1 Express Inc.
as 1:2015cv00124
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local No. 172 Welfare Fund et al v. Vic Trippel Plumbing & Heating Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00194
Plaintiff: Plumbers & Pipefitters Local No. 172 Welfare Fund , Plumbers & Pipefitters Local No. 172 Pension Fund , Plumbers & Pipefitters Local No. 172 Apprenticeship and Journeyman Training Fund and others
Defendant: Vic Trippel Plumbing & Heating Inc., Vic Trippel, LLC
Cause Of Action: ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fun
ARMSTRONG et al v. CELLULAR SALES OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00133
Plaintiff: ERIK ARMSTRONG, JAMES CARTWRIGHT, NICHOLE KRUSE
Defendant: CELLULAR SALES OF INDIANA LLC, CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
Colvin et al v. J M Argenta, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00187
Plaintiff: Fred A Colvin , William Solivais
Defendant: J M Argenta Inc
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
NORTON v. YARGUS MANUFACTURING, INC.
as 2:2015cv00131
Plaintiff: CHARLES J. NORTON
Defendant: YARGUS MANUFACTURING, INC.
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
HENDRICK v. TOWN OF SUMMITVILLE, INDIANA
as 1:2015cv00748
Plaintiff: ANTHONY HENDRICK
Defendant: TOWN OF SUMMITVILLE, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.