US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,123
Barker v. McKenzie
as 3:2022cv00613
Petitioner:
Adam Anthony Barker
Respondent:
Warden Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lotz v. Akers
as 3:2022cv00575
Petitioner:
Jerry David Lotz
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00144
Petitioner:
James Bradley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stone v. Green
as 3:2022cv00545
Petitioner:
Dante' Corvette Stone
Respondent:
David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph v. Green
as 3:2022cv00536
Petitioner:
Shilo Thomas Joseph
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henson v. Green
as 3:2022cv00537
Petitioner:
Marlon Henson
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fant v. Green
as 5:2022cv00136
Petitioner:
Andre Fant, Jr.
Respondent:
David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rudometkin v. Commanding General
as 3:2022cv00497
Petitioner:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant:
Commanding General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dennison v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2022cv00482
Petitioner:
Michael Dennison
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carroll v. Hendricks et al
as 1:2022cv00121
Petitioner:
Brandon Carroll
Respondent:
Judge Hendricks, Jailer Pennick, Logan County Circuit Court, Ky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
