US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 128
Luv N Care Ltd v. S C Products Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00822
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd
Defendant:
S C Products Inc and Michael L McGinley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Interco Tire Corp v. Earth Art Gems & Jewelry
as 6:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
Interco Tire Corp
Defendant:
Earth Art Gems & Jewelry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Interco Tire Corp v. K B Titanium Designs Inc
as 6:2017cv00321
Plaintiff:
Interco Tire Corp
Defendant:
K B Titanium Designs Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Interco Tire Corp v. Swalberg Fashion
as 6:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Interco Tire Corp
Defendant:
Swalberg Fashion
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Interco Tire Corp v. American Sportsman Jewelry
as 6:2017cv00318
Plaintiff:
Interco Tire Corp
Defendant:
American Sportsman Jewelry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Luv N Care Ltd, et al v. Atziloose L L C, et al
as 3:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd and Admar International Inc
Defendant:
Atziloose L L C and Bombino Express Pvt Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Waiter.com Inc v. Waitr Inc
as 2:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
Waiter.com Inc
Defendant:
Waitr Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Servpro Intellectual Property Inc et al v. Rytech of S W L A et al
as 2:2016cv00950
Plaintiff:
Servpro Intellectual Property Inc and Servpro Industries Inc
Defendant:
Rytech of S W L A, Servco of S W L A L L C, Rapid Response Restoration & Construction L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Luv N Care Ltd v. Laurain et al
as 3:2016cv00777
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd
Defendant:
Lindsey Laurain and Eazy-P Z L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Luv N Care Ltd v. S C Products Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00641
Plaintiff:
Luv N Care Ltd
Defendant:
S C Products Inc and Michael L McGinley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
