US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,592
Lindsey v. Richland Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jamie H Lindsey
Defendant:
Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center and Kendra Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fontenot et al v. Guillory et al
as 6:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Peter Fontenot and Jacqueline Fontenot
Defendant:
Charles R Guillory and Jules Lebas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaglin v. Torres
as 2:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Moses Wayne Eaglin
Defendant:
Paul A Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mayo
Defendant:
William Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Wade
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
John McCray
Defendant:
Tyler Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
En'Derrell Hawkins
Defendant:
Det Davis, Det Doyle, Det Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moncrief v. Lafayette City Police, et al
as 6:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Damien Rashad Moncrief
Defendant:
Todd Reid, Tyier Mitcham, Angerer Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Unknown Defendants
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Joel N Roberts
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gash v. Gaspard
as 6:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Darell J Gash and Darell Jonic Gash
Defendant:
Brentt Gaspard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Louisiana et al
as 5:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Deantwon Taylor
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, 1st District Court, Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
