Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 9,871
Thomas v. Tubbs et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Douglas Thomas, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Tubbs, Isaac Brown and Trevor Wilhite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavergne v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lavergne
Defendant:
Timothy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Tubbs et al
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jawan Garcia
Defendant:
Mike Tubbs, Warden Wilhite, Asst Warden Clack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sepulvado v. Thomas et al
as 5:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Steven Dean Sepulvado, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Thomas, Berlin Sweet, Jesse W Branam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Semmes et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Khristopher Watkins
Defendant:
Danny Semmes, Edwardo Mendoza, Clarence Cormier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Miya v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Kerry Salas De La Miya
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff v. Home Depot Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
James Curtis Ratliff
Defendant:
Home Depot Corporation, Blake Delaune, Cox Cable and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. Francis et al
as 2:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sterling
Defendant:
Joseph Francis and Chris Lambert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Graham
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center and Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. 21st Judicial District Court
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Randy Miller
Defendant:
21st Judicial District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
