Maryland Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 310
Gomez et al v. Chipotle Services, LLC
as 8:2019cv03398
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alexis Rivas Cornejo, Abigail Guzman Rivas, Laura V Purca and others
Defendant:
Chipotle Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramani v. Genesis Healthcare, Inc.
as 8:2019cv03342
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth M. Ramani
Defendant:
Genesis Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 A
Faby v. CSX Transportation, Inc
as 1:2019cv03337
Plaintiff:
Christopher Faby
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Rivera v. Jefferson et al
as 1:2019cv03347
Plaintiff:
William M. Rivera
Defendant:
Jessica Cuches, Principal Dwight Jefferson and Anne Arundel County Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
National Association of Agriculture Employees v. Trump et al
as 8:2019cv03057
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Dale Cabaniss and Donald J. Trump
Plaintiff:
National Association of Agriculture Employees
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 7101
Allen v. Headwater Leasing, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02860
Plaintiff:
John W. Allen
Defendant:
Headwater Leasing, Inc. and Frito Lay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen v. Cort Trade Show Furnishings et al
as 1:2019cv02859
Plaintiff:
John W. Allen
Defendant:
Cort Trade Show Furnishings, One Stop Staffing Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
English v. Businessolver.com, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02799
Defendant:
Businessolver.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven M. English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eskay et al v. Tesla Energy Operations, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv02590
Defendant:
TESLA ENERGY OPERATIONS, INC., SEAN T PRICE and TESLA, INC.
Plaintiff:
RICHARD (BRENT) ESKAY and Sean T. Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maceio Choice v. Paragon Syst., Inc.
as 8:2019cv02562
Plaintiff:
Maceio Choice
Defendant:
Paragon Syst., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.