US District Court for the District of Minnesota Labor Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 587
Dixon v. Marketplace Unction, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv02728
Defendant:
Tek Hamment and Marketplace Unction, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stacy Dixon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Seow et al v. Miyabi Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv02692
Plaintiff:
Kok Haut Seow, Nae Kyong Yom, Jisoo Kim and others
Defendant:
Youyan Chen, Cher Leong Yong, Zhongzi Zhen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Gestach v. Auto Butler, Inc.
as 0:2019cv02680
Plaintiff:
Paul Gestach
Defendant:
Auto Butler, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson v. FLSmidth, Inc.
as 0:2019cv02661
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
FLSmidth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hashi v. Jambo! Deli & Coffee LLC et al
as 0:2019cv02644
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
African Development Center, ADC Commercial Real Estate, Inc., Nasibu Sareva and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Hashi
3Rd Party Defendant:
Mahad Ibrahim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Lundberg v. Sid Harvey Industries, Inc.
as 0:2019cv02112
Defendant:
Sid Harvey Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Lundberg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Murphy et al v. Labor Source, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv01929
Plaintiff:
Marcquise Murphy and Ratanya Rogers
Defendant:
BluSky Restoration Contractors, LLC and Labor Source, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Raiche v. 5 Star Pizza, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv01895
Plaintiff:
Jaycob Raiche
Defendant:
Susan L. Graves and 5 Star Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sunderland et al v. Garda USA, Inc.
as 0:2019cv01877
Plaintiff:
Peter John Reiff and Michael Dean Sunderland
Defendant:
Garda USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vallone et al v. CJS Solutions Group, LLC, The
as 0:2019cv01532
Plaintiff:
Joyce Vallone and Erasmus Ikogor
Defendant:
The CJS Solutions Group, LLC d/b/a The HCI Group and CJS Solutions Group, LLC, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
