US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc. v. The Neverleak Company, LP
as 3:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc.
Defendant:
The Neverleak Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Piggly Wiggly, LLC
as 4:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Piggly Wiggly, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
GreensPerfection, LLC v. The Toro Company
as 3:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
GreensPerfection, LLC
Defendant:
The Toro Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Piggly Wiggly, LLC
as 3:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Piggly Wiggly, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
HomeSafe Inspection, Inc. v. Hayes
as 3:2014cv00209
Plaintiff:
HomeSafe Inspection, Inc.
Defendant:
John Hayes
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Fulgham v. Wofford et al
as 4:2013cv00182
Plaintiff:
Murray G. Fulgham
Defendant:
Bruce E. Wofford and Animal Total Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Homesafe Inspection, Inc. v. Assured Home Inspection, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00201
Plaintiff:
Homesafe Inspection, Inc.
Defendant:
Assured Home Inspection, Inc. and Charles R. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Unified Messaging Solutions, LLC v. BancorpSouth, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
Unified Messaging Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
BancorpSouth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
McDaniel v. Harbor Freight Tools, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
William A. McDaniel
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
