Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 12,985
Dudley v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dudley
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Walker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Shanreckia Lanell Walker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Burch v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jill Burch
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Didovic v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Semsa Didovic
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Clarke v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Rodee Clarke
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hiner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Hiner
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Merrill v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Jack Anthony Merrill
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Miller v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kandie Ann Miller
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rundblad v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Janine R. Rundblad
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Linton v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Linton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
