Montana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,317
Parker v. State of Montana
as 4:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
James Michael Parker
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yuste v. State of Montana
as 6:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Elias Yuste
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. U.S. District Court et al
as 6:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Steven Gene Johnson
Respondent:
U.S. District Court and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. State of Montana
as 1:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
James Ronald Wilson
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McVey v. Attorney General of the State of Montana
as 9:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Michael Nathan Shae McVey
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reding-Lorenzana v. Bludworth
as 4:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Jorge Reding-Lorenzana
Respondent:
Peter Bludworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Milless v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Chad R. Milless
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. State of Montana
as 1:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Joshua Dixon
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Friedt v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Dennis Friedt
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re Tracey Godfrey
as 9:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Tracey Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
