New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,709
YOUNG v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv04853
Petitioner: SPENCER YOUNG
Respondent: BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KUBS v. GANNON
as 2:2024cv04749
Petitioner: KYLE-JOSEPH KUBS
Respondent: JAMES GANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLARK v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04641
Petitioner: WILLIAM CLARK
Respondent: WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KUBS v. GANNON
as 2:2024cv04676
Petitioner: KYLE-JOSEPH KUBS
Respondent: JAMES GANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04651
Petitioner: DEAN SHORES
Respondent: R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUHAMMAD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04724
Petitioner: RAAJHAUN MUHAMMAD
Respondent: WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04582
Petitioner: DEAN SHORES
Respondent: R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SAUZO v. THOMPSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv04545
Petitioner: CARLOS SAUZO
Respondent: WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
POSSO v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv04555
Petitioner: 28235-078 DAYRUN ALBORNOZ POSSO
Respondent: WARDEN and FCI, FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VALEJO v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv04421
Petitioner: CARLOS VALEJO
Respondent: WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?