New Jersey Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 18,911
KUBS v. GANNON
as 2:2024cv04676
Petitioner:
KYLE-JOSEPH KUBS
Respondent:
JAMES GANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04651
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUHAMMAD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04724
Petitioner:
RAAJHAUN MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMPSON v. EICKHOFF et al
as 1:2024cv04644
Plaintiff:
MARLON D. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL EICKHOFF and SGT. GOVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv04645
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARK WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, DR. FARRAH AHMEDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04582
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GARRETT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv04598
Plaintiff:
JACOB TIMOTHY GARRETT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS N.J.D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK et al
as 1:2024cv04755
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, INDIANS DEES STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. WASHINGTON D.C. COMMONWEALTHS et al
as 1:2024cv04758
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON D.C. COMMONWEALTHS, APPELLATE COURT TRENTON SHERIFFS, REPUBLICS IMMIGRANTS PROSECUTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAUZO v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04545
Petitioner:
CARLOS SAUZO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
