US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Cases 21 - 30 of 146,348
Miller v. Remolacha LLC
as 1:2024cv03495
Plaintiff:
William Miller
Defendant:
Remolacha LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
RAHMAN v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv03502
Plaintiff:
MAKSUDUR RAHMAN
Defendant:
US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Bellomo v. Big Lots Inc.
as 2:2024cv03480
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bellomo
Defendant:
Big Lots Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Skartvedt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03478
Plaintiff:
Erik D Skartvedt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Sompo Japan Insurance, Inc. v. China Airlines Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv03460
Plaintiff:
Sompo Japan Insurance, Inc.
Defendant:
China Airlines Ltd. and Nishi-Nippon Railroad Co., Ltd. doing business as NNR Global Logistics
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Korein v. Exactech Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03457
Plaintiff:
Michael Korein
Defendant:
Exactech Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
