US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,138
Scarborough v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Lachele Scarborough
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Starnes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ryan Starnes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Craven v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Mary Bordeaux Craven
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Patrika Carpenter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Wyant v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Isaac Wyant
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Krantz v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Krantz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Schultz v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Kamina Helene Schultz
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bennett v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Allison Bennett
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Webb v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Nelson Webb
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
