District of North Dakota Social Security Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Ferguson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2015cv00032
Plaintiff: Roger D. Ferguson
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Davis v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv00159
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Ranada S. Davis
Interested_party: SSA
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Erickson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00113
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Travis Mark Erickson
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Saunders v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00104
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Elisha Saunders
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
Poitra v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2014cv00094
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Alan F. Poitra, II
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blake v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv00075
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Kimberly Blake
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
Boelter v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00070
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Edwin B. Boelter
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wolf v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv00058
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Jason E. Wolf
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Elfman v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv00029
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Priscilla J. Elfman
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schlenker v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00025
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Arley L. Schlenker
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.