North Dakota Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Trotter v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Brian Earl Trotter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ryan v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Corey James Ryan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bingham v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Abraham Bingham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Denton v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Paul Mathew Denton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ashby v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Ila Ashby
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Carpenter v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Roberta Carpenter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Zona v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Natalie Zona
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
General Counsel Ssaogcomms Ssaogcomms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Neiss v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Allen Neiss
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Miranda Miller
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
McCluskey v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Michael McCluskey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
