US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 10,438
Baker v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Nathan L Baker and Nathan L. Baker
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Sheriff Jerry Greene, Warden Kountz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goins v. O'Donnell
as 1:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Justin Goins
Defendant:
Warden O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannon v. USA
as 1:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Doyal R. Cannon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Bailey et al.
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Smith
Defendant:
Sam Bailey, Holmes County Sheriff's Office Investigators, Jim Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lauck v. Black
as 3:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Dean Lauck
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckstein v. Lloyd et al.
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Andrew Eckstein
Defendant:
Inspector Diane Lloyd, Warden Jennifer Black and Lutinent D. Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Darryl Smith
Defendant:
Anette Chambers-Smith, Timothy McConahay, James Kennard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. USA
as 1:2024cv00513
Petitioner:
Deandre Allen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sudberry v. Stuff et al.
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
James D. Rome Sudberry
Defendant:
Warden Stuff, Booth, Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
