US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,999
Heavener v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
John E Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carshall
as 6:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Billy Carshall
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Walter D. Hunter
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward v. McIntosh County, et al.
as 6:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Frank Edward, Jr.
Defendant:
McIntosh County, et al.,, Kevin Ledbetter, Monica Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Begay v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Stacey Begay
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. Farrow
as 6:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
David M. Palmer
Defendant:
Nancy Farrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tony Kent Blake
Defendant:
Suzanne Jordan, Terry Parks, Choctaw County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jason Javon Franklin
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Devra Atwood, Landon Gary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Wisner et al
as 6:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Matthew Joseph Douglas
Respondent:
Geri Wisner, Matthew J. Hall and Lisa Otipoby-Herbert
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Habeas Corpus - Indian Civil Rights Act (detention)
Travis v. Seminole Nation Tribal Court
as 6:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Ralph Eugene Travis
Respondent:
Seminole Nation Tribal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
