Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 10,816
Johnson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00297
Petitioner:
Joe Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooks v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Elzie Wayne Hooks, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Black v. Youth and Family Services of Enid et al
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Black
Defendant:
Youth and Family Services of Enid, Melissa L Blanton, Garfield County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Shannon Latarion Scott
Respondent:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
Milton D Grayson, Jr
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heavener v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
John E Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carshall
as 6:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Billy Carshall
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williamson v. Garfield County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Justice Walter Williamson
Defendant:
Garfield County Detention Facility, Amanda Lilly and Enid County Police Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Walter D Hunter
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Lane
as 5:2024cv00285
Petitioner:
Curtis Tyrone Brown
Respondent:
Reece Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
