Oklahoma Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 320
Hackler et al v. Proform Group, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hackler
Defendant:
Proform Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Workers Adjustment & Retraining Act
Benitez v. Installed Building Products, LLC
as 4:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Benitez
Defendant:
Installed Building Products and Installed Building Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Sutton v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00951
Plaintiff:
James A Sutton
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Steele v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Phillip Steele
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates Inc, Wal-Mart Stores East LP and Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Forbes v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 6:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Janis Forbes
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Riebold v. FleetPride Inc
as 5:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Kelley Riebold
Defendant:
Fleetpride Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Goforth v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc
as 5:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Catherine Goforth
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Anderson v. Trilogy Residential Management, LLC
as 4:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Shantelle Anderson
Defendant:
Trilogy Residential Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Harris v. Highgate Hotels LP
as 5:2022cv00898
Plaintiff:
Tanja Harris
Defendant:
Highgate Hotels LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Trimble v. Fedex Company
as 4:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Clarissa V Trimble
Defendant:
Fedex Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
