US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Torts - Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 751
TAYLOR v. ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2021cv04276
Plaintiff:
TAD TAYLOR
Defendant:
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. PFIZER, INC.
as 2:2021cv04275
Plaintiff:
ALBERT EDWARDS
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JERRY v. MOORE COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN
as 2:2021cv04177
Plaintiff:
EURAINA S. JERRY
Defendant:
MOORE COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
POWELL, SR. v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIS N.V.
as 2:2021cv03412
Plaintiff:
David Powell, Sr.
Defendant:
Koninklijke Philips N.V. a/k/a Royal Philips, Philips North America LLC a/k/a Philips NA, Philips RS North America LLC a/k/a Philips RS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIDEOUT, ET AL. v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
as 2:2021cv03326
Plaintiff:
JUDSON A. RIDEOUT, Jay J Rideout and Joseph M Rideout
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TEST DOE v. ABC CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv99999
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PEARCE et al v. CESSNA FINANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv02874
Plaintiff:
GARY L. PEARCE and PEARCE ENTERPRISES LLC
Defendant:
CESSNA FINANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randall et al v. CESCAPHE LIMITED, L.L.C.
as 2:2021cv02806
Defendant:
CESCAPHE LIMITED, L.L.C., CESCAPHE LIMITED, L.L.C. doing business as CESCAPHE EVENT GROUP and Joseph Volpe
Plaintiff:
Michael Randall, Molly Randall, Maggie Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
153 SUCKLE HIGHWAY, LLC v. PORTNER
as 2:2021cv02408
Plaintiff:
153 SUCKLE HIGHWAY, LLC
Defendant:
JOEL PORTNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glime v. Susquehanna Valley Pre-Owned Sales & Service et al
as 2:2021cv02257
Plaintiff:
Eric Glime
Defendant:
JUSTIN VALENTINE and Susquehanna Valley Pre-Owned Sales & Service
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
