US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 63
HANSEN v. MCKIVIGAN et al
as 2:2007cv00885
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. HANSEN
Defendant:
LARRY J. MCKIVIGAN and FURNACE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LINDBERG v. CLARION SINTERED METALS, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
ANNE M. LINDBERG
Defendant:
CLARION SINTERED METALS, INC., HOWARD H. PETERSON and BENJAMIN F. MARZELLA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
CEHULA et al v. JANUS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC
as 2:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN E. CEHULA, JR., ANN MARIE CEHULA, JULI DEAN CEHULA and others
Defendant:
JANUS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC and JANUS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC
Mediator:
MARK SHEPARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
WALDEN POND DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. RUCCI
as 2:2007cv00036
Defendant:
SEBASTIAN RUCCI and SEBASTIAN RUCCI
Plaintiff:
GARY COOPER, GARY COOPER and GARY COOPER
Movant:
DAN PIKUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
RAYMOND v. GENERAL MOTORS, MOTORS HOLDING et al
as 2:2007cv00031
Plaintiff:
GERALD H. RAYMOND
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS, MOTORS HOLDING, GENERAL MOTORS, MOTORS HOLDING, GENERAL MOTORS, MOTORS HOLDING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
LEZEK et al v. ROSKOVENSKY
as 2:2006cv01550
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
PWH TRUST et al v ERIE FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2006cv00241
Cause Of Action: Diversity -
MURPHY et al v. MID EAST OIL COMPANY et al
as 2:2006cv01343
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LAN v. LUDROF et al
as 1:2006cv00114
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
IN RE: THE EDWARD MELLON TRUST v. UBS PAINEWEBBER, INC. et al
as 2:2006cv00184
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
