Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 190
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. PRODUCE SERVICES & LOGISTICS, INC.
as 2:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant:
PRODUCE SERVICES & LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101
FALLON v. METABANK et al
as 2:2011cv07591
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY FALLON
Defendant:
METABANK , META PAYMENT SYSTEMS , META FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
DICIOCCIO v. SUN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 2:2011cv07525
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DICIOCCIO
Defendant:
SUN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Shupp et al v. Reading Blue Mountain and Northern Railroad Company
as 3:2011cv02137
Plaintiff:
Dale F. Shupp and Judith A. Shupp
Defendant:
Reading Blue Mountain and Northern Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HONIK v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
as 2:2011cv07056
Plaintiff:
GRACE HONIK
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707
PELLETRON CORPORATION v. C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
as 5:2011cv06944
Plaintiff:
PELLETRON CORPORATION
Defendant:
C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11707
KARN v. MORROW
as 2:2011cv01402
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. KARN
Defendant:
CLAYTON S. MORROW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Hudson Keystone Express, LLC
as 3:2011cv01810
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Hudson Keystone Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AILERON SOLUTIONS v. HEALTH MARKET SCIENCE, INC.
as 2:2011cv04244
Plaintiff:
AILERON SOLUTIONS
Defendant:
HEALTH MARKET SCIENCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Wildcat Minerals, LLC
as 4:2011cv01004
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Wildcat Minerals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
