Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 373
Shull v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 1:2019cv00715
Plaintiff:
Bobby A. Shull
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. PFM BUSINESS VENTURES LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01415
Defendant:
RALPH FENNER, PFM BUSINESS VENTURES LLC and GARY MCFADDEN
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. KAR HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv01414
Defendant:
KAR HOLDINGS, INC. and KATHLEEN ROSARIO
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC v. K.P. ARROW, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00177
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC
Defendant:
K.P. ARROW, INC. and KEITH D. SHARRER
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
DISH NETWORK L.L.C. et al v. MOFFETT
as 1:2017cv00287
Plaintiff:
DISH NETWORK L.L.C. and NAGRASTAR LLC
Defendant:
CLIFTON MOFFETT
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. WEST et al
as 2:2017cv04270
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
CHUNG WEST and JAMES WEST
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Zito Media v. Haggerty et al
as 4:2017cv01676
Plaintiff:
Zito Media
Defendant:
James M. Haggerty , Felice Haggerty , Joseph Haggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. AFFSI
as 2:2017cv04072
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
RACHED AFFSI
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. WEINER et al
as 2:2017cv04071
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES WEINER and 3348 GERMANTOWN AVENUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. GOLDMSITH et al
as 2:2017cv04047
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
RAMZE GOLDMSITH, SWANIE GOLDMSITH and GOLDSMITH & GOLDSMITH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
