Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 262
HAN et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2012cv01787
Plaintiff:
HEEOON HAN , YOUNG EUN LEE , WILLIAM K. CHANGE and others
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUPERT et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. RUPERT and JACQUELINE C. RUPERT
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
3Rd Party Defendant:
STEPHEN B. MACON and BRAYMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
EATON v. WACKER NEUSON CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv00306
Plaintiff:
TYLER EATON
Defendant:
WACKER NEUSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD v. PRESTIGE EXOTIC CAR SALES
as 2:2012cv00935
Plaintiff:
GRACE D. FORD
Defendant:
PRESTIGE EXOTIC CAR SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULAWKA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv01651
Plaintiff:
MARZENA MULAWKA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MERCER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURADOV et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2011cv07668
Plaintiff:
YUNUS MURADOV and RUSTAM SUVANIDZE
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEWTON et al v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv07667
Plaintiff:
CELESTINE NEWTON and JOHN NIEDERBERGER
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION and TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMOUSE v. GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
as 2:2011cv01456
Plaintiff:
SANDRA SMOUSE
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Debellis et al v. Coney et al
as 1:2011cv02100
Plaintiff:
Jill Debellis and Stephen Debellis
Defendant:
Lynn Coney and L.D.S. Leasing Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STAUDT v. SHOWA BEST GLOVE, INC.
as 2:2011cv01239
Plaintiff:
DAVID STAUDT
Defendant:
SHOWA BEST GLOVE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
