US District Court for the District of South Carolina Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 415
Nutramax Laboratoies Inc et al v. Pet Healthbox LLC
as 0:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Nutramax Laboratoies Inc and Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Services Inc
Defendant:
Pet Healthbox LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Composite Resources Inc v. Recon Medical LLC
as 0:2017cv00273
Plaintiff:
Composite Resources Inc
Defendant:
Recon Medical LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Cat Resources LLC v. Recon Medical LLC
as 0:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Cat Resources LLC
Defendant:
Recon Medical LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Epson America, Inc. v. USA111, Inc.
as 0:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Epson America, Inc.
Defendant:
USA111, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Overhead Door Corporation v. Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Greenville Inc et al
as 6:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Overhead Door Corporation
Defendant:
Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Greenville Inc and ASSA ABLOY Entrance Systems US Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Thermal Engineering Corporation v. The JDS Company, Inc et al
as 3:2016cv03965
Plaintiff:
Thermal Engineering Corporation
Defendant:
The JDS Company, Inc and The Grill Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Anderson Chamber of Commerce v. Mance
as 8:2016cv03948
Plaintiff:
Anderson Chamber of Commerce
Defendant:
Michael Mance
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Jeffers Handbell Supply Inc v. Schulmerich Bells LLC
as 0:2016cv03918
Plaintiff:
Jeffers Handbell Supply Inc
Defendant:
Schulmerich Bells LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Achieve It Inc v. Napoleon Hill Foundation
as 8:2016cv03777
Plaintiff:
Achieve It Inc
Defendant:
Napoleon Hill Foundation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Normark Corporation v. United Plastic Molders Inc
as 6:2016cv03665
Plaintiff:
Normark Corporation
Defendant:
United Plastic Molders Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
