US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 118
McCoy v. Lake Tansi Village Property Owners Association, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Myron D. McCoy
Defendant:
Lake Tansi Village Property Owners Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Edwards v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center
as 3:2016cv02620
Plaintiff:
Lashawn Edwards
Defendant:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. Columbia Machine Works, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00076
Plaintiff:
Eddie F. Wright
Defendant:
Columbia Machine Works, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Parchman v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02376
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh Parchman
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Robinson v. Young Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee
as 3:2016cv02280
Plaintiff:
James D. Robinson
Defendant:
Young Men's Christian Association of Middle Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
West v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02091
Plaintiff:
Adam West
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, P.A. et al
as 3:2016cv01674
Plaintiff:
Amanda Smith
Defendant:
Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, P.A. and Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Beard v. Wilson County Board of Education
as 3:2016cv01569
Plaintiff:
Robert Carlton Beard
Defendant:
Wilson County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rayton v. Akebono Brake Corporation
as 3:2016cv01370
Plaintiff:
Michelle Rayton
Defendant:
Akebono Brake Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gates-Gean v. Budd Group, Inc., The et al
as 3:2016cv01198
Plaintiff:
Tammy Gates-Gean
Defendant:
Budd Group, Inc., The, S and K Services, Inc., Carolyn Clay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
