District of Tennessee Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 1,801
Hughes v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv02339
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Murphy v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2015cv00126
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff: Jeffery C. Murphy
Cause Of Action: Denial of Social Security Benefits
Gant v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv02319
Plaintiff: Rosa Lisa Gant
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneou: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hughes v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00536
Plaintiff: David Monroe Hughes
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision
Brown v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv02290
Plaintiff: Ira Leon Brown, Jr.
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hicks v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00189
Plaintiff: Stella Louise Hicks
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Burnette v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2015cv00024
Plaintiff: James Robert Burnette
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Briggs v. Colvin (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00175
Plaintiff: Martha Carlene Briggs
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davidson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff: Linda E Davidson
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Sykes v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv02248
Plaintiff: Jimmy Lee Sykes, Jr.
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.