US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,958
Andrepont v. Tabares et al
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Krystal Andrepont
Defendant:
Yuri Pen Tabares and Yuri Auto Transport Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Ervin v. The Kroger Co.
as 6:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ervin
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wilson v. Top 40 Express Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Carla Wilson
Defendant:
Top 40 Express Inc. and Gregory Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Terrazas v. Ley
as 2:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Zaydee Terrazas
Defendant:
Stancie Diane Ley
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Brown v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Darlene Brown
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. and Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Cooks v. Averitt Express Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
David Cooks
Defendant:
Averitt Express Inc. and Angela Lecomte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Vasquez et al v. U.S. Xpress, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Cesar Vasquez and Mayra Vasquez
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dickens v. Dollar Tree, Inc.
as 9:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Luquece Dickens
Defendant:
Dollar Tree, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wilson v. Ibarra, et al.
as 4:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cox Wilson
Defendant:
Carolina Ibarra and Maria Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Mirsham v. Fiesta Mart, LLC
as 4:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Maryam Mirsham
Defendant:
Fiesta Mart, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
