US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Williams v. City of Dallas, Texas
as 3:2011cv00397
Defendant:
The City of Dallas, Texas
Plaintiff:
Staci Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chittum v. United States Government
as 1:2010cv00184
Plaintiff:
Ricky Chittum
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Le v. Jacks et al
as 3:2009cv02211
Plaintiff:
Vincent T. Le
Defendant:
James T Jacks, Eric Holder and Ray Mabus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Sackett v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2009cv00648
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Sackett
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Bishop v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2009cv00290
Plaintiff:
Karen Kay Bishop
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Teuton v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2008cv00189
Plaintiff:
Larry M Teuton, Larry M Teuton, Larry M Teuton and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shopteese v. Panhandle Northern Railroad LLC
as 2:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
Michael J Shopteese and Michael J Shopteese
Defendant:
Panhandle Northern Railroad LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gentzel v. Panhandle Northern Railroad Company
as 2:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Richard D Gentzel, Richard D Gentzel and Richard D Gentzel
Defendant:
Panhandle Northern Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Porter v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2008cv00003
Plaintiff:
Tommy Porter
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Rackley v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2007cv00273
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Rackley, Dorothy Rackley and Dorothy Rackley
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company and BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
