US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 10,979
Clark v. LumpkinCase transferred to Eastern District of Texas - Beaumont Division.
as 3:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Herbert Charles Clark
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Beltz et al
as 7:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
William Joseph Sullivan
Defendant:
Tracey Beltz, Sara Hennessey and Janett Kindall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cardenas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01138
Petitioner:
Isaac Cardenas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strieder v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01065
Petitioner:
Karen Marie Strieder
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pradia v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01045
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Pradia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vallejo Recio v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Daniel Vallejo Recio
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitaker v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00994
Petitioner:
Ryan Jivaro Whitaker
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonso v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00968
Petitioner:
Ralph Ernest Alonso
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
