Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 102,502
Krikie v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01054
Petitioner:
David Paul Krikie
Respondent:
State of Texas and Dallas County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Juarez v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Luis Jesus Juarez
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. USA
as 6:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Romelia Flores
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carter v. USA
as 1:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Dustin Ray Carter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Recio-Rosas v. United States Of America
as 7:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Recio-Rosas
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Modica v. USA
as 3:2024cv01073
Petitioner:
Jerrell Lee Modica
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Whitaker v. Mills
as 3:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Jamison Whitaker
Defendant:
Officer Ryan Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Miguel Davila, Jr
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons South Central Regional Office and Office of Management and Budget
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Mitchell v. Home et al
as 4:2024cv01656
Plaintiff:
Ivory R. Mitchell
Defendant:
Chief Home, Travis Turner, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
