Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 4,454
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Doe John
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Strike 3
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Leisure Products, Inc. v. Trike Shop of Minnesota, Inc
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Leisure Products, Inc. doing business as California Sidecar
Defendant:
Trike Shop of Minnesota, Inc doing business as Roadsmith Trikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Apple Inc. v. Zerodensity Yazilim Anonim Sirketi
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc.
Defendant:
Zerodensity Yazilim Anonim Sirketi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Fractal Analytics, Inc. v. fractalyx.com
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Fractal Analytics, Inc.
Defendant:
fractalyx.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
