US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Social Security Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 4,883
Thompson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03172
Plaintiff:
Stacy Jean Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ruth v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03170
Plaintiff:
Tawnya Lynn Ruth
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ikeyda v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05148
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ikeyda
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tello-Contreras v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03168
Plaintiff:
Veronica Tello-Contreras
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mueller v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Walter Mueller
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Payment v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03164
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Payment
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hammons v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lyn Hammons
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Farnsworth v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03163
Plaintiff:
Joshua E Farnsworth
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schill v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Paden Acacia Schill
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mendoza v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03161
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Mendoza
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
