Wisconsin Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,576
Voechting v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Amy L Voechting
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Miller v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Lewis Miller, Jr. and Lewis Miller, Jr
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Proko v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Vasilika Proko
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Kamphuis v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Benjamin K. Kamphuis and Benjamin K Kamphuis
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reedy v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
LaShonda H Reedy
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sawatske, Allyson v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Allyson K Sawatske and Allyson K. Sawatske
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Whittemore v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
James Ralph Whittemore, Sr
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Evangelista, Kelly v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Kelly J. Evangelista
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Iverson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jodi M Iverson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rodebush v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Jamie A Rodenbush and Jamie A Rodebush
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
