GULF RESTORATION NETWORK v. JEWELL et al
Gulf Restoration Network |
Sally Jewell, United States Department of Interior, Kathryn Sullivan, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Gina McCarthy, Environmental Protection Agency, Tom Vilsack and U.S. Department of Agriculture |
1:2015cv00191 |
April 8, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
XX US, Outside State |
William E. Cassady |
Charles R. Butler |
Environmental Matters |
42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDER granting 69 Motion to Clarify; granting 76 Motion for Leave to File Surreply, as further set out. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 5/23/2016. copies to parties. (sdb) |
Filing 65 JUDGMENT. The Federal Trustees have violated NEPA and OPA by failing to conduct a proper alternatives analysis with respect to the Gulf State Park lodge and conference center project contained in the Phase III PEIS. Both the Federal Trustees and the State Trustee are enjoined from expending any of the $58.5 million in early restoration funds for use in the development or construction of the Gulf State Park lodge and conference center until such time as the Trustees comply with the alternatives analysis requirements of OPA and NEPA. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 2/16/2016. copies to parties. (sdb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.