Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 319
Eliza Wille v. Gina Raimondo
as 24-1734
Defendant: RICHARD SPINRAD, in his official capacity as Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, GINA M. RAIMONDO, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Plaintiff: SHELLEY CAREY, ELIZA WILLE and LISA DENNING
NORTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00255
Defendant: BANGOR MAINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JUSTIN CARTER and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ANTHONY NORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United Cook Inlet Drift Association et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2024cv00154
Defendant: Jon Kurland, Gina Raimondo, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Plaintiff: United Cook Inlet Drift Association and Cook Inlet Fishermen's Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK v. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv01898
Defendant: NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
United Cook Inlet Drift Association et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: Cook Inlet Fishermen's Fund and United Cook Inlet Drift Association
Defendant: Janet Coit, Jon Kurland, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Petitioner: State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
American Remediation & Environmental, Inc. v. Confluence Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: American Remediation & Environmental, Inc.
Defendant: Confluence Corporation doing business as Regal Service Company, United States of America, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America et al v. General Recycling of Washington LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ON BEHALF OF THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, The State of Washington through the Washington Department of Ecology, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and others
Defendant: General Recycling of Washington, LLC, The David J. Joseph Company, Nucor Steel Seattle, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
United States of America et al v. Crowley Marine Services Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: The United States of America, on behalf of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the United States Department of the Interior, The State of Washington through the Washington Department of Ecology, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and others
Defendant: Crowley Marine Services, Inc., 8th Avenue Terminals, Inc., Washington Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
NORTH CAROLINA FISHERIES ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2023cv03905
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA FISHERIES ASSOCIATION, INC., SOUTHEASTERN FISHERIES ASSOCIATION, INC., SFA EAST COAST FISHERIES SECTION and others
Defendant: GINA RAIMONDO, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1801 Fishery Conservation and Management Act (FCMA)
Groundfish Forum, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2023cv00283
Plaintiff: Groundfish Forum, Inc.
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Gina Raimondo and others
Intervenor: Central Bering Sea Fisherman's Association, St. Paul, City of, Alaska Longline Fishermen's Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?