Tucker et al v. Southwestern Energy Company et al
| James Tucker and Mindy Tucker |
| BHP Billiton Petroleum (Fayetteville) LLC, Southwestern Energy Company, XTO Energy Inc and Chesapeake Energy Corporation |
| 1:2011cv00044 |
| May 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Cleburne |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
JUDGMENT re 150 Order dismissing claims against XTO Energy without prejudice. All claims against the other defts are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/29/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER denying 131 Motion for Ruling; finding as moot 135 Motion to Amend/Correct; finding as moot 136 Motion to Strike ; finding as moot 138 Motion to Strike. An amended final scheduling order will issue soon. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/11/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER setting forth the particulars of the telephone conference on June 14, 2012. The Amended Scheduling Order's ddls about experts are revised, as set forth in this Order. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/14/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER denying 100 Motion to Dismiss Party; finding as moot 106 Motion to Stay. Discovery stay as to BHP is lifted. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/6/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER dismissing all of the plaintiff's claims against deft Chesapeake with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/17/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER taking under advisement 106 plaintiff's emergency motion to Stay consideration of BHP Billiton's motion to dismiss; granting 107 Motion to Quash; and cancelling the deposition noticed for May 14, 2012. Pltfs should respond to BHP Billiton's motion by May 21, 2012, with BHP Billiton's reply being due seven calendar days after pltfs respond. BHP Billiton should file an expedited response to the motion to stay consideration of the motion to dismiss by May 21, 2012. Pltfs' reply is due seven calendar days after BHP Billiton responds. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/11/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER re 85 Order concerning recusal. The Court is not disqualified from sitting and there is no good reason for me to recuse. I will therefore continue in the case. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/6/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion to Dismiss; denying 76 Motion for Order. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/17/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
79
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/16/11. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
