Jones v. Ramsey et al
| Justin L Jones |
| Rouse, Vernon Robertson, Christopher Budnik, Raylina Ramsey and McIntyre |
| 1:2014cv00141 |
| November 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Batesville Office |
| Jackson |
| James M. Moody |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
JUDGMENT is entered dismissing this case with prejudice 58 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 2/23/2016. (lej)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Clerk shall alter the docket to reflect that Defendant 'Rouse' is 'Allen Rouse' and that Defendant 'Christopher Budnik' is 'Christopher Budnic'. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted 38 . Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Rouse, Robertson, Budnic, and Davis are dismissed without prejudice due to his failure to exhaust administrative remedies against them. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/16/2015. (lej)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Partial Report and Recommendations as regarding the dismissal of Defendant McIntyre. Plaintiff's disciplinary allegations are referred to Judge Volpe for additional consideration. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/18/2014. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
